Saturday, January 01, 2005

Zen, Spiritual Realities, The Joyous Cosmology



I read Alan Watts' book The Joyous Cosmology:
Adventures In The Chemistry Of Consciousness
last night and later I entered my deepest meditative state. I realized that my spiritual reality is always characterized by desolation; mental imagery of desolate streets, empty rooms, deserted ruins, isolated landscapes, etc. My soul inhabits a desolate universe which lacks the desire to communicate itself because there can be no other. My spiritual reality is also unreal in that it encourages a complete acceptance of its mystifying, otherworldly character. It is a supernatural reverie that never becomes a dissociative state. I have always found it to be thus and I have consistently described it thusly.


However, this is not the spiritual reality described in The Joyous Cosmology. What Alan Watts describes is a spiritual reality that is not unreal. Rather it is a spiritual reality that is a very intense awareness of physical reality fully present to consciousness. He also describes a wonderful sense of communion with his fellow psychonauts and this is definitely contrary to my sense of spiritual isolation.


Therefore I have come to the conclusion that I do not experience the definitive spiritual reality but rather my particular spiritual reality. In order to know the joyous cosmology I would need the assistance of an entheogen but even that might merely provide a confirmation of my spiritual reality because entheogens allow one's essential nature to be expressed. They do not provide a consistent experience to all users. They do not bring about the same realization for all users. For the same reason Zen may prove to be useless in the face of my spiritual reality. Zen may seem to point the finger elsewhere but its practices, concepts, precepts, koans, and community will merely lead me to my usual destination which I will assume is where the path was meant to lead me. Zen is not a dogmatic religion. It merely asks you to go beyond thought and experience for yourself the essential aspect of your true nature. Zen is slippery and does not even presume to know where its finger is pointing.


Please note that I am only making some observations. I am noncommittal on absolute truth. I do not judge my desolate unreality. I do not accuse it of being delusional. I do not judge the use of entheogens or Watts' joyous cosmology, although it clearly contradicts my inner experience. I do not judge Zen and its practices.


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home